Skip to content


March Gladness

Although not a constant fan of college basketball, I’ve always loved participating in the NCAA March Madness Pool at my office. When I left the company last August, I knew that March Madness would be one thing that I’d miss. So I was psyched to return to the company at the beginning of March, just in time to fill out my tournament bracket.

“It’s destiny,” I trash-talked to co-workers. “Destiny has sent me back here so that I may crush all of you in the March Madness Pool. I can feel it.” I took my fanciful logic to the next level: Destiny wants me to avenge last year’s disastrous results by making the same picks. It’s why I’ve returned.

So I selected Kansas to win the championship for the second year in a row (I picked them last year after being inspired/freaked out by Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood). And even more amazing, I picked Kansas to win the championship by beating Memphis. And Kansas won last night in a sensational overtime game over Memphis, earning me tons of points in the office pool despite my tepid beginnings.

What a game! Kansas was down by 9 with 2 minutes to go, and I was thinking how much I hated the March Madness Office Pool for getting my hopes up and making me stay up until 11:30 to watch Memphis win. And then, all of a sudden… Memphis missed four foul shots, Kansas prevailed, and I prevailed too. I finished #2 out of 91 people in the office pool, earning me a gift certificate and, infinitely more important, bragging rights. Yee-haw! I’m back and I’m winning office games. Destiny.

Posted in The 9 to 5.

Tagged with .


Missed Manners

The Boston Globe has an article about the growing popularity of etiquette classes for children as young as 4 years old. The classes are meant to reinforce dining etiquette and table manners that parents may struggle to instill due to “an increasingly fast-paced and informal society.”

For example, one expert who charges $45 to $80 for an hourlong manners session or $1000 for extended private tutoring says “So many of these children had never seen two forks.” Now I’m not a parent, so I hesistate to judge anyone’s parenting skills, but I just gotta wonder… how can any parent let their child reach 6 years old and be ignorant as to a two-fork place setting? Let’s face it, people. You’ve already failed.

Anyway, it would be unnecessary for me to share my dire predictions about a society where table manners need to be taught in a class because there’s “not enough time” for children to absorb them the old-fashioned way: By suffering through family dinners during which their every move and word is scruntinized and, if needed, corrected by fearless, attentive parents.

That is how my parents taught table manners. In fact, most of our family dinners were basically etiquette classes because my siblings and I were little heathens, fond of poking each other under the table, sucking up spaghetti strands individually, and failing to use a napkin. Me, I would catch hell for reading books at the dinner table, a practice which I now admit is beyond rude, but man oh man, those Sweet Valley High books were as addictive as crack.

The most heinous breach of etiquette at the Green family dinner table was placing your elbows on the table. Perhaps my recollection of this rule is amplified by the fun that my siblings and I had in ‘catching’ each others’ violations: “Brian has his elbows on the table! Laurie has her elbows on the table!” This made me very meticulous about resting my hands in my lap when I’m not eating. (And then I married a Frenchman, who comes from a country where removing your hands from the table is a serious dining faux pas. So currently, I’m rather schizo about where I’ll put my hands, but Mom, Dad, I swear: No elbows!)

When my siblings and I wanted to leave the dinner table, we were required to ask “May I please be excused?” Exactly like that. In fact, we could sit there all night asking “Can I please be excused?” or “May I be excused?” and my Dad would say “No” until we asked correctly: “May I please be excused?” I think that my parents would have considered sending us to “Manners for Minors” classes tantmount to putting us up for adoption.

Posted in Nostalgia.

Tagged with .


45:49

Today I ran the 5-mile Cambridge City Run. It was my first running race in several years. I’ve become a lazy runner, which may sound like an oxymoron, but compared to runners who track their mileage, pace times, personal bests, sneaker miles, and other stats, I’m the nonchalant, “Think I’ll go for a jog” type with no preconceived notions of how I’d fare against a clock.

“I’ll be happy if I finish under 55 minutes,” I told people. Aiming for 11-minute miles seemed sounder than 10-minute miles, which is what I did in the last race that I ran when I was younger and more motivated.

The weather at race time was the nicest it has been all week: Gray, windy, and 40 degrees. Miraculously, it was not raining (yet). There were hundreds of runners, as well as large groups of Cambridge teenagers participating in a concurrent 3-mile walk for the Andrea Harvey Memorial Fund (here.) Soon after the start of the race, I fell into a comfortable pace and let Mr. Pinault disappear into the pack ahead of me. At Mile Marker 1, my headphones prevented me from hearing the split time being called out by a man with a stopwatch. I picked out a ‘rabbit’ — a small woman in shorts whose legs were red from the cold. We passed a fair number of people. At the Mile 2 marker, I lowered the volume on my iPod to catch the split time: 18:30.

Not bad! I thought. The race began to circle the Fresh Pond Reservoir on an unpaved trail, and I contended with puddles and mud as well as strolling dog-walkers and families. Passing the other runners became difficult, and my ‘rabbit’ hopped away. The wind coming off of the reservoir was frigid. To make matter worse, the runners soon merged with the walkers — packs of teenagers who clogged the path and amused themselves by making fun of the runners. I increased my pace just to get away from them.

There was no Mile 3 marker. When I reached Mile 4, I was stunned to hear: 37:15. The realization that I was running 9:30-minute miles invigorated me, and when a woman in a Red Sox hat passed me, I vowed to return the favor. I trailed her until the only substantial hill in the race, a 1/2 mile from the finish. She slowed down and I sped up, overcoming her at the top of the hill. I ran like hell to the end and finished at 45:49 (410th place out of 701 total, 38 out of 93 in my age/gender.) Man, I was psyched, and exhausted, and rather hungry.

Posted in Existence.

Tagged with , .


Rainy Day Woman

I’m walking on a residential section of Massachusetts Avenue, where unimpeded cars and buses speed on through to the next strip of commerce. My umbrella is pitched forward to protect my face from the wind-driven rain. I am thinking about a map in a recent New York Times that illustrated national population trends. There were prominent arrows pointing from the Northeast to places like Florida, Texas and Arizona. Every ten feet, my umbrella throttles a wind gust.

A voice breaks my pensiveness. “Excuse me, can I ask you a question?” A short older woman with a nest of bright orange hair and matching eyebrows darts over to me. She wears a thick wool coat and nothing to protect her from the rainstorm.

She’s going to ask me for money, I thought, but I stopped and turned to face her, positioning the umbrella accordingly. “Sure.”

“Have you heard about the postal service’s new rule?” she asked while mopping her forehead with her coat sleeve.

She’s crazy, I thought. “What do you mean?”

The woman walked over to a nearby USPS blue mailbox and pointed to a decal on the top that explained the 13-ounce weight restriction. “It says that stamped mail that weighs over 13 ounces cannot be mailed here. It says it’s a new rule.”

“Yes,” I said.

“So can I mail it here or not?” She pulled a thin envelope out of her pocket. Literally half of the envelope was covered in stamps.

She’s joking? “You can mail that. It’s not over 13 ounces.”

She turned to the collection box again and began reading the notice aloud. “Attention, new 13-ounce rule…”

“How much postage did you put on it?” I interrupted, and she looked at me blankly. “Do all of those stamps total 41 cents?”

“Yes, yes,” she said. Silly question. “But it says…”

“You can mail it here,” I said. “Definitely. It’s not over 13 ounces.”

“Oh, okay,” she said. “I just wanted to make sure I’m doing the right thing, cause it’s a new rule.”

“It’ll work,” I promised, and she dropped it in the box, thanked me, and scampered away. I couldn’t suppress one last judgment on the poor woman:

She’s as dim as the sky during a rainy Friday afternoon.

Posted in Americana.

Tagged with , .


Blog-Worthy

While walking in Harvard Square, I trailed behind a college girl who I didn’t notice until she squealed into her cell phone “That is so blog-worthy!”

I have moments like that, when something triggers a mental stream of words and one half of my mind is concatenating them into blog while the other half is committing digestible phrases to memory so that I may later honor the blog-worthiness.

So now, to give some nuance to this vacuous post, let’s reflect back on the college girl, totally unaware that she is so blog-worthy.

Posted in Existence.

Tagged with , .


Lest Ye Be Judged

Back in February, the local news had great fun over the DUI arrest of Boston-based federal court judge Robert Somma, who had rear-ended a pick-up truck with his Mercedes Benz and then failed a field sobriety test and a breathalyzer. The kicker is that the accident occured after Judge Somma, who is married and was appointed by President Bush, had left a gay bar in Manchester wearing a black cocktail dress, fishnet stockings and high heels. Since he was alone, he was obviously unlucky in more ways than one.

The Boston Herald wouldn’t put a virtually-unknown bankruptcy judge on the cover for a DUI arrest unless he appears to be wearing blue eye shadow in his mugshot. The paper could hardly contain their glee over the police report, which described Somma’s vampy outfit and how Somma “fumbled” in his purse to retrieve his license, presumably because he was so wasted. Or maybe he just had some purse clutter to contend with.

Judge Somma immediately resigned from the bench, but an article in today’s Globe reported that Somma is reconsidering his resignation because of the “outpouring of support from judges, lawyers, and others.” Somma decided that “the media frenzy occasioned by this episode would not be an impediment to my continued service as a judge”).

I’m glad and frankly surprised that there are people within the federal judiciary who are open-minded enough to accept that a man with cross-dressing tendencies can still be a competent judge and want to continue to work with him. But in their eagerness to overlook his salacious proclivities, are they not also overlooking the fact that Somma was driving while intoxicated enough to cause an accident?

Judges are supposed to be incorruptible civic bastions of integrity, virtue, and most importantly… good judgment. But we live in an age where no one who is white, educated and successful has to take responsibilitity for their actions. So what may end up happening is Somma pays $600, gets a yearlong driving suspension, apologizes for “that terrible lapse of judgment” and returns to the bench, where everyone will wonder if he’s wearing a short black black dress underneath his long black robe.

Posted in In the News, Massachusetts.

Tagged with .


April Foolery

I decided to play an April Fools’ Day prank on Mr. P. Not out of meanness, of course, but to honor his cultural heritage. You see, the custom of playing pranks on April 1 is thought to have originated in France in the sixteenth century, when a royal decree moved New Year’s Day from April 1 to January 1, leading to jokes being played on those who did not accept or know about the change. Today the French call April 1 Poisson d’Avril (“April Fish”), which comes from the hilarious medieval hoax of putting dead fish on people’s backs while they slept.

I considered doing what French children do nowadays: Taping a paper fish to Mr. P’s back and yelling “Poisson d’Avril” when he discovers it. But I hankered for a cruel, harmless American prank. I mulled over possibilities: Salt in the morning coffee? Dead bugs in the cream cheese? Perhaps I could hide all of his boxer shorts?

After weighing the difficulty of each option against the potential explosiveness of his reaction, I decided to pull the ole’ switcheroo on his Rusk shampoo, since it’s not like he really needs shampoo anyway. I poured his shampoo into another bottle then scoured the kitchen cabinets for a plausible substitute. Maple syrup matched the orange-pink hue best, but is too precious of a commodity to waste, so I selected olive oil instead.

When Mr. P went into the shower this morning, I waited with bated breath for something unusual to happen, but he emerged after a wholly-typical 20 minutes. I immediately gave myself away by demanding “How was your shower?” with a big grin.

He laughed when I declared him an “April Fool!” Not as long and hard as I laughed, of course, but without any hard feelings. It was a great success, though he did promise payback. I hope that I don’t wake up on April 1st next year with a dead fish on my back.

Posted in Existence.

Tagged with .


Movie Reviews: Boarding Gate and Atonement

Venerable publications rarely review multiple movies in one article, and when they do, it’s because those movies are somehow linked. Perhaps they appeal to the same niche audience, or they are showing at the same film festival, or their strengths and weaknesses can be juxtaposed in a clever way. So I feel sort of lame saying that the only commonality between Boarding Gate and Atonement is that I saw them both this past weekend.

Since Boarding Gate bombed at the Cannes Film Festival, it is resigned to showing at small art house cinemas who eschew any movie with the potential for mild commercial success. Oliver Assayas wrote and directed this pseudo-thriller about a sexy Italian semi-hooker (played by Asia Argento, a sort of an Isabella Rossellini for the Maxim generation) who lives a kinky, crime-filled existence, then is involved in a murder and must make a tension-filled getaway to Beijing. It sounds really exciting, but the real killers were the superfluous dialogue and the wooden acting. And woah, what is Kim Gordon, bassist for Sonic Youth and Iggy Pop lookalike, doing in this film? No really, what was she doing? I couldn’t tell if I was meant to understand the plot or if my mind just refused to properly digest all of the bloated lumps of conversation that dragged this film into the dirt.

It feels rude to dump on a movie when I was already convinced of its suckiness when I saw previews. I had no intention of ever seeing Atonement, but the second-run movie theatre near my house has been obstinately screening it since its Oscar nomination and I finally gave in. I knew its polished cinematic loveliness would give it no reason to be little more than an emotionally hollow historical romance, but in all fairness, I feel that my low expectations stocked the inward groans and sighs that mounted as the predictable plot unfolded. Normally I dig movies set on sprawling British estates about clueless, idle aristocrats and their nuanced relationships with the servants, but this one strayed too far into The English Patient territory. And upon the ludicrous and patronizing ending, it suddenly turned into Titanic. Jesus Christ.

I guess Boarding Gate and Atonement have a few more things in common: Both were underwhelming, both are more satisfying to trash rather than watch, and both would have benefitted from a Philip Seymour Hoffman cameo in which he plays a droll policeman who frequently hand-cuffs the other actors, slaps duct tape over the mouths, and rants to them about their character flaws.

Posted in Review.

Tagged with .


Gray Day

My New York City friends must think that I’m mighty cultivated, because whenever I visit, I clamor to be taken to museums. Of course, I hardly maintain such a regimented pursuit of culture in my hometown. But as a weekday reader of The New York Times, I often long to visit the exhibitions reviewed in Friday’s Arts section. One such article about the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s “Jasper Johns: Gray” has been stuck in my head since February, making me a determined museum patron on this past weekend’s trip to New York.

Johns was fond of using iconic imagery — his most famous work is his American flag, with the stars lined up in an ominous grid. He also made counterpart prints for many of his paintings to experiment with his favorite motifs — targets, maps, numbers — and found the color gray to be effective in forcing the familiar shapes and forms to be considered literally. I found it alarming when I stared at the American flag in shades of gray and my mind supplied the colors. There were gray paintings with rectangles cut into the canvas, or glued-on forks and spoons, or a string draped across like a necklace. There was peace and serenity in Jasper Johns’ gray works that, as the NYT raved, “amplifies gray into a color spectrum all its own.”

Sometimes, art is so visually pleasing that it has the power to stand by itself, without a critic’s interpretation or commentary to enhance its enjoyment. And then there’s Jasper Jones, whose cryptic, aesthetically unpleasing paintings sent most of the museum patrons flocking the Gustave Courbet exhibit down the hall to relish in the classic, colorful scenes of animals, landscapes, and nudes.

Here is a slideshow of some works from “Jasper Johns: Gray.”

Posted in Culture.

Tagged with , .


Surrealistic Love Boat

I’m not one of those people who says “Now I’ve seen everything!” Because that’s a statement rift with superlative presumptuousness. How can anyone purport to have seen “everything”?!?

But I just watched a video of Andy Warhol’s appearance on The Love Boat (here). And for the first time in my life, I’m compelled to state that I’ve seen everything.

Posted in Culture.

Tagged with .