Skip to content


Giving Candy to Babies

It’s 7:30pm and we’ve had about 10 groups of trick-or-treaters so far. The first group consisted of about a dozen small children around the ages of 4-8. They were so cute. I mean, at that age they’re naturally cute, but smear their faces with make-up and put them in smocks, capes, and tutus, and I’m helpless. I held out my basket of Airheads, Menthos, lollipops, mini Hersheys, and chocolate-covered raisins, and said indulgently “You can take a couple of candies.”

I have since realized that young children know not the meaning of “a couple,” or “a few,” or “several,” especially if there’s a basket full of candy in front of them. Who knew little hands were capable of holding so much? One little fairy strategically clenched 4 packets of Airheads while using her thumb to nab a Hersheys and her remaining fingers to ensnare 5 or 6 lollipops. What am I going to do, demand she put some back? It’s Halloween. Indulge, children, indulge.

Posted in Existence.

Tagged with .


The Huckleberry

Today the NYTimes called quarterback Brett Favre the NFL’s “freethinking huckleberry”. I read the article, eager to discover what constitutes a “freethinking huckleberry” in the vast industrial complex that is the NFL. I mean, what does that even mean? What on earth is a ‘huckleberry’, and how is it an applicable term to Brett Favre? For me, it suggests “huckster,” which implies that a huckleberry is one who is used by a huckster, which would seem an apt analogy for a legendary quarterback who comes out of a 3-month retirement in order to join a team as inadequate and, frankly, despicable as Mangini’s NY Jets. But let’s see what the NY Times says.

After the article’s colorful introduction via the Jets’ locker room (“This is Sparta. The rookies and the mack daddies, the hard cases and the head cases, the low talkers and the loudmouths with their tattoos as inscrutable as runes…”), the reporter again invokes the term “huckleberry” in reference to Favre: “He was an absolute natural, one of the best who ever lived, revered even by his opponents as the gunslinging Huckleberry, the last of his line.”

“Gunslinging Huckleberry”!? Huh. From that, I inferred that a huckleberry is a quarterback who can reliably toss, heave, but mostly fire the ball forward towards completion. It’s got a Midwestern twang to it that’s befitting of the greatest Green Bay Packer ever, yet it’s esoteric enough to be the found in an elite East Coast periodical’s ode to their football team’s new “old man.” It’s football romanticism, and I’m a sucker (suckleberry?) for it. Best line in the article: “for all the butch rigor and happy fascism of football, for all the martial metaphor and the ringing bromides about team spirit, the best players in this game are artists.”

Posted in In the News.

Tagged with .


She’s Nobody

Emily Dickinson was ruined for me way back in high school, when my favorite English teacher pointed out that the bulk of her poems could be sung to the tune of “The Yellow Rose of Texas.” Despite me being a Yankee, this tune was actually imbued in my ears thanks to my Casio keyboard, which had a dozen pre-programmed Americana melodies to which the user could pair with an array of looping rhythms, like “Camptown Races” with a bossanova flair, or a disco beat for “Amazing Grace.” So whenever I lay eyes on an Emily Dickinson poem (“Because I could not stop for Death / He kindly stopped for me /The carriage held but just ourselves / And Immortality”), my mind unfailingly sings it to that catchy Southern anthem, and I give up in amused annoyance.

Even the Dickinson poems that do not readily conform to the meter of “The Yellow Rose of Texas” give me difficulties, as I read them intent on making them suitable lyrics for the cursed tune. (“Going to heaven! / I don’t know when, / Pray do not ask me how – / Indeed, I’m too astonished / To think of answering you!”) Draw out some syllables, curtail others… and you can kinda make out “The Yellow Rose of Texas.”

My inability to get into Emily Dickinson may not seem like a big deal except I went to college in Amherst, majored in English, and probably squandered opportunities to meet and learn from the scholars who flock to the Dickinson homestead in Amherst, where Emily was born and lived out the majority of her reclusive life. The first time I visited the Dickinson museum with a friend, I told him about my issues with “The Yellow Rose of Texas” and Emily Dickinson. “Oh, yeah. You know, it also works with Sylvia Plath and ‘Dixie,'” he dead-panned. (Luckily I was well over my Sylvia Plath phase, otherwise she too would be ruined.)

Lately, I’ve persisted in reading Dickinson anyway. I dig on her utterly original mix of whimsy and mystery, and I’ve even grown fond of that familiar Southern cadence that echoes in my brain whenever I read her. Here is a poem that is a bit morbid, but when sang to the tune of “Yellow Rose,” is much more chipper and light-heartedly.

I wish I knew that woman’s name,
So, when she comes this way,
To hold my life, and hold my ears,
For fear I hear her say

She’s “sorry I am dead”, again,
Just when the grave and I
Have sobbed ourselves almost to sleep,-
Our only lullaby.

Posted in Culture.

Tagged with .


I Want Candy

Ever since the calendar hit October, my neighborhood has been primping itself for Halloween. The porches and lawns in front of the minimally-spaced two-family homes have spurted pumpkins, skeletons, gravestones, and other props with which to scare the children and glorify the occult. One house down the street wins the prize for its porch display that features an assembly of a dozen stuffed human figures, all dressed in sweatshirts, jeans, and werewolf masks, a sinister sight which is arguably more jarring at noon than at midnight.

So for the first time in many years, I am living in a neighborhood where I can actually expect Trick or Treaters to come begging at my door, forcing me to make a trip to CVS in order to purchase Halloween candy. It’s the first time I’ve ever bought a bag of candy with the intent of distributing it, and it took me about 20 minutes of acute deliberation to make my selection.

Firstly, the CVS appeared to be running out of candy. There were no Snickers, Milky Way, Butterfinger, Baby Ruth, 3 Musketeers, Twix, Mounds, or Almond Joy. There were Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, but they were bagged with Reese’s Pieces and (ugh) Reese’s Sticks. In fact, the trend in the candy aisle was to bundle the most awesome candy with lesser but similarly-constructed confectionary and sell it for $10/bag. So if I wanted to buy Peanut M&Ms, it came along with plain M&Ms and the despised mini M&Ms.

I eyed the remaining candy with a nutritive perspective. Why can’t they have tiny boxes of trail mix? I wondered as I wrinkled my nose over the Whopper/Milk Dud combo pack. It’s not that I care if I contribute to childhood obesity, because it’s practically a nonexistent condition in the Boston metro area anyway. In fact, I worry that local children don’t get enough sugar in their diets. Last week I heard a toddler on the subway throwing a tantrum for yogurt. Disturbing! No, I’m worried about my own slowing metabolism, because what adult can resist the temptation to snag a few (or more) of the individually-wrapped goodies during the lull between doorbell rings?

So if I can’t have something healthy, then I’ll get something that won’t tempt me too much. Out: M&Ms, Kit Kats, Hersheys. Acceptable: Gummy things, lollipops, and anything that is 100% sugar without any redeeming chocolate or nougat. After combing the candy aisle several times, I finally settled on an Air Head/lollipop/Menthos combo bag. As I walked home in the chilly nighttime wind, I ripped open one of the mini-Menthos rolls and promptly chewed the 6 candies, one at a time. I then tried out a mini-Airhead, which is like chemical-tasting taffy, and found myself intoxicated with a pure jolt of candy. I power-walked past the Werewolf house, effusing sugar happiness and chortling with Halloween spirit.

Posted in Americana.

Tagged with , .


Red-handed

I suffered a bit of a moral quandary when considering if I should post this FBI surveillance photo of soon-to-be-former Massachusetts State Senator Dianne Wilkerson stuffing a $1,000 cash bribe into her bra at a swanky Beacon Hill eatery (here). (Ironic, since it does not appear that Wilkerson is undergoing similar confliction.) On one hand, this is a sensational photo that the local media will plaster tabloid-style all over itself. On the other hand, this is a sensational photo! I’ve never seen anything like it: A much-aligned controversial local politician caught cramming a relatively petty amount of cash into her bra.

Wilkerson has always claimed that people are out to get her. Indeed, for the past decade of her political career, she has been a magnet for allegations about everything from unpaid parking tickets to failing to pay $50,000 in Federal taxes. And because she is a black woman in a state that does not exactly welcome blacks nor women in the stalwart Irish/Italian White Guy power structure, I have always given Wilkerson the benefit of the doubt.

But tonight, I gaze upon this picture of Wilkerson with utter fascination. She is a dirty politician who is fully aware of the impropriety of taking this bribe money… otherwise, why would she by stuffing it into her bra? It represents a rare moment of cut-and-dry judgment on a politician, because even the most skilled politico cannot begin to refute what is happening in this photo.

wilkerson

Posted in In the News, Massachusetts.

Tagged with .


Movie Review: Religulous

I’ve been a fan of Bill Maher for over a decade. He is a rare comedian who will forgo his role as a passive clown in order to argue down irrationality and ignorance with his uniquely scrappy wit and wisdom. He believes in things, like the decriminalization of prostitution and drugs, saving the environment, ending corporate tax breaks, downsizing the government, and that “9/11 wasn’t a triumph of the human spirit. It was a fuck-up by a guy on vacation.” And in the documentary Religulous, Maher explores various brands of religious extremism while riffing upon another belief: That religion is a neurological disorder that may eventually bring about the end of the world.

The movie starts modestly, with Maher visiting a cramped “Truckers Chapel” at a highway rest stop and quizzing truck drivers about why they believe in Adam, Eve, and a talking snake. This alarmed me, because what I didn’t want to see was 2 hours of Maher ridiculing average people for their personal religious beliefs. Luckily, Maher quickly ups the crazy bar and interviews a range of zealots, from a ‘Jew for Jesus,’ to US Senator and creationist Mark Pryor, to self-proclaimed Jesus descendant Jose Luis De Jesus Miranda, to an Isreali man who invents devices that allow Jews to sidestep Shabbat prohibitions, to the founder of an organization that believes in a literal interpretation of the book of Genesis (they have a “museum” with exhibits that show children playing with dinosaurs). All of this is very funny, and progressively disturbing.

The highlight of the movie is a trip to the Holy Land Experience in Orlando, a theme park that “brings the Bible alive” with exhibitions and reenactments. After Maher banters with the Jesus actor, who was actually one of the few interviewees to hold his own, we see Jesus getting crucified to the applause and tears of a camera-wielding audience. America, you scare me.

Religulous is directed by Larry Charles, who most recently directed Borat as well as Seinfeld and Curb Your Enthusiasm. The ambush-style interviews work well in that they are very funny, but not very fair. Sure, religion isn’t logical and there’s no evidence of Jesus or God. Sure, the religious shepherds are living large off of the fleece(ing) of their flock. Sure, America’s founding fathers would be disgusted b the intrusion of religion into politics. Sure, Mormons and Scientologists are especially batshit loony. But everyone has a right to believe in what they want to believe. Do these people deserve to have their personal faith pilloried by this snide, swarmy little bastard?

Perhaps this is why Maher ends the movie with his grandiose justification: After a tour of the Dome of the Rock and a short exploration of Islamic beliefs, Maher predicts… that the end of the world will come as a result of religious extremism. It was a strangely somber ending after the rollicking laughs and mirth. Overall, more entertainment than enlightenment.

Posted in Review.

Tagged with .


The Tomato Babies

We had started the tomatoes on our enclosed veranda at the beginning of spring. We tucked organic plum tomato seeds in long plastic planters filled with nitrate-rich soil. We babied them with attention. We debated if we were watering too much or not enough, if they would enjoy morning sun or afternoon sun, if the spring chill would impair their growth. We rejoiced when the sprouts emerged from soil, and took pride in the steady growth of our tomato babies.

The tomato babies grew as if determined to outgrow their containers. They became so crowded that they looked as if they were holding hands. Mr. P felt it was time to move them to the garden, saying they would be happier outside, that they would have space to stretch their vines into the air and roots into the ground. It was only the end of May, and I fretted that the nights were still too cool to allow them outside. But I gave in, knowing that we couldn’t keep the tomato babies in planters forever.

We moved the tomato babies to the garden. They didn’t adjust very well at first. Their leaves drooped and turned yellow. We thought they were dying, but after a few weeks, they regained their health and continued to grow. I had other fears for their safety, particularly from the neighborhood squirrels and any errant rabbits. Another threat was our neighbor’s ivy growing on the fence behind the plants. We hacked off the invading vines, but it grew fast and determined towards our tomato babies.

We had no control over the biggest problem, which was the rain. Constant soaking thunderstorms dropped three times the normal rainfall in June and July. The development of the tomatoes slowed. The tiny yellow flowers gave us hope, but there was no fruit when there should have been fruit. Finally, in the second week of August, scores of tiny green bulbs burgeoned from the sepals. We reinforced the ties to the posts. We pruned the leaves not destined to become fruit-bearing stems. We were excited to reap our tomato bounty. But just as the green bulbs developed into full-sized fruit, the days grew mild and shorter. The deepest color that our tomatoes could manifest was a blushing orange.

We plucked our tomato babies from the vines and we gathered the fallen ones from the topsoil. Their flesh was parched and dense. They were not sweet. But we ate them. We ate pounds of them. How could we not? Yet we were silently disappointed. Our expectations were not met. Our efforts were not rewarded. Our tomato babies had grown up, and they lacked any redeeming quality other than that they were ours.

Posted in Culture.

Tagged with .


The Paradox of Patriotism

During our trip to Spain, where internet access and American news were scarce, my media withdrawal was inconveniently timed with the Vice Presidential debate. “How do you think Biden did?” I’d anxiously ask Mr. P. His reassurance was always the same: Sarah Palin couldn’t possibly outmaneuver Joe Biden verbally. What he didn’t fully grasp, however, was that pre-election debates aren’t showcases of substance—they’re performances of character. I imagined Biden carefully corralling his righteous anger to avoid looking like a condescending chauvinist. Meanwhile, I pictured Palin gleefully doling out her charismatic, twang-laden soundbites to the collective delight—or horror—of the nation.

Lately, though, the public perception of Palin seems to have polarized further. On one end, there’s a faction so repulsed by her they can’t even laugh at Saturday Night Live parodies. On the other, you have ardent fans who genuinely believe she’s a modern-day reincarnation of Queen Esther.

Palin’s latest eyebrow-raiser came during a speech in North Carolina, where she praised the “hard-working, very patriotic, um, very, um, pro-America areas of this great nation.” Naturally, she later “clarified” that her comments were misunderstood, as if suggesting some parts of the country are anti-America was a benign misstep. But you know what? She might have stumbled onto something.

If being “pro-America” means unwavering support for whatever America does—its policies, its actions, its messy, bulldozing tendencies—then, yeah, neither I nor most of New England would qualify as pro-America.

But I’m not anti-America either. I genuinely love this country—its diversity, its energy, its ideals. I often find myself defending it against the constant critiques of a certain Frenchman in my life. “Why are American cars so big? Why is your healthcare system such a disaster? Why are kids only in school six hours a day? Why does it cost more to take the train to Philadelphia than to fly? Why is this ‘kiddie-sized’ ice cream bowl the size of my fist? Why do you need assault weapons? And why, for the love of God, does Viagra dominate your football commercials?” On most of these topics—and countless other cultural, political, and logistical grievances—I try to muster a defense, even though, frankly, America often feels indefensible.

So where does that leave me? Not pro-America, not anti-America. There has to be a label for people like me who love to hate and hate to love this country. Contramerica? Disamerica? Misamerica? Paramerica? Hypo-America? Malamerica? (Or have I wandered too far into linguistic elitism for a nation that thrives on stark pro-versus-anti binaries?)

Posted in In the News.

Tagged with , .


These Dreams

Were this a private diary that I could stash in a drawer, I’d spill out tales of personal woe—many involving work—without a second thought. But this is a public space, a digital soapbox, so I exercise restraint. Because, ultimately, having a job is a good thing… mostly.

It’s a shame, though, because some of my office stories could genuinely make you laugh. And coming off a vacation, even I find humor in them. Ah, the magic of a vacation! Skin clears, eyes brighten, smiles come easier. The mundane takes on a fresh glow, and the metaphorical noose around your neck loosens a little. Suddenly, life has perspective, and everything feels manageable.

Another side effect of vacation is that my dreams intensify. When there’s no alarm, no nagging to-dos, no immediate tasks upon waking, dreams become vivid movies with elaborate, almost Byzantine, storylines. I awake still absorbed with the drama, comedy, or tragedy that my mind just staged. It haunts me for hours.

“So I had this dream last night,” I’ll begin telling Mr. P over breakfast.

“Again?” he says in disbelief.

Then the vacation ends and I return to work. Gradually, my nighttime entertainment peters out. Dreams are neither good nor bad, they’re just vague impressions of a locality or an object that are forgotten as soon as my feet hit the floor.

Recently I had a very realistic dream: I’m in the basement of my office building, waiting for the elevator. I had just picked up a lunch from Cosi (a large lentil soup) and I’m nibbling on the accompanying piece of Cosi flatbread. Because it’s lunchtime, the elevator is taking a long time. I can hear it “ding” several floors above the the basement, and loud voices funnel down the shaft to me. They are the familiar voices of men who I have known for 7 years. The elevator stops again on the lobby level, and the voices grow louder.

One voice raises above the din of male hooting: “Did you see how her tits were flapping around!” which rouses other snippets of vulgar exaltation. The elevator door opens and I am staring at the occupants of the elevator, whose faces register surprise and embarrassment. “Did you hear that?” one asks me as they file out sheepishly. I say nothing but cannot stop smiling in abject horror at having heard my colleagues objectify a woman with tawdry slang on the elevator, which everyone knows leaks sound like an earbud.

But, like I said, it was only a dream. (And if it weren’t, would I really be writing about it?)

Returning to work, I find myself wondering: is it the dreams that reveal a deeper truth or just my mind playing tricks on me, trying to inject a bit of absurdity back into the daily grind? Either way, for now, I’ll take the ambiguity. It’s easier to navigate than reality sometimes.

Posted in The 9 to 5.

Tagged with , .


We Let the Dogs Out

More than six weeks have flown by since I’ve sat down and composed a real blog entry in the good ole’ Meredith Green spirit. What have I been writing in the meantime? Oh, all sorts of things, like the world’s most detailed Wedding Day schedule, replete with timelines, task assignments, maps, and seating charts; 58 Thank You cards, in which the first paragraph formulaically thanks the guest for the wedding gift and the second paragraph either free-styles a heartfelt appreciation for the guest’s attendance or expresses understanding and absolution over the guest’s inability to attend; oodles of technical documentation; journal entries that ricochet from manic to meditative to mirthful; and, most recently, an awkward sympathy email to a co-worker who blasted the whole company with an email entitled “My X-wife had a brain aneurysm.”

So here I am, trying to drum up the irreverance and wit that once brimmed within my brain. I’m out of practice. I started writing about this motley group of about 15 teenagers that I walked passed while crossing a bridge over the Fort Point channel during lunchtime. More than half were minorities, most were boys, and all wore large dark-colored hooded sweatshirts and baggy jeans. This ragtag group fanned themselves out over the width of the bridge’s sidewalk, forcing oncoming pedestrians to weave between them. And when the innocent pedestrian was caught in their web, a white kid whose scrawny body swan in his black hoodie would lean towards them and bark loudly in their ear: “WORRF! WORRF!” He timed it so the pedestrian could not see him and would turn around in confusion, upon which his croonies would laugh.

I saw this happen twice as I approached the gang, both times to lone men. Dread mounted in my stomach as the gap between myself and the teenagers shrunk. I tried to manuever myself to the far left of the sidewalk so that I would not pass by the chief rogue, but his associates were configured in such a way that blocked any avoidance. I steeled myself as our paths began to converge, but then! Reprieve in the form of a large hairy black kid calling attention to himself by chanting a nonsensical jingle that caused his audience to crack the fuck up! I passed by unmolested and somewhat disappointed that I could not mentally spew retorts to the young man such as “Why don’t you ease the pressure on our judical system by just willing give yourself up to the custody of the American penal system right now?”

But as I wrote a retelling of the episode, I found myself hesistating. Is it fair to point out that the youth were mostly minorities? Must I sound so fustic about typical teenager hijinks? Maybe the problem isn’t them, it’s me for being so goddamned old and anxious. I was young once. I looked at people like me, with their 9-5 jobs and innocuous office clothes, with their smell of fear and desperation, with their all-consuming own personal ennui… AND I JUST ABOUT BARFED. Fools! Sycophants! Sheeple! We deserve to be accosted on the streets by the problems that we try to ignore. We deserve a bark in the ear!

Posted in Existence.

Tagged with .